China's Threats

Joel Skousen's Discussion Forums: Strategic Relocation: Asia: China's Threats
 SubtopicMsgs  Last Updated
Archived Posts to this Topic 32   04/10 09:52pm

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Marcus Alfonso

Tuesday, April 10, 2001 - 10:52 pm Click here to edit this post
To All: Marcus here, did you hear last night's Art Bell interview? He had Phillip Hoag on (some people worry, others prepare) author. A survivalist specialist somewhat like myself only better. Cause he has more $. Anyway, it was good. Prepare for Nuke & Bio war here - chemical is not cost-efficient for an ICBM. Let's talk about anything. I'll use my 11 yrs as an Natural Disaster/NBC specialist anyway I can to meet the upcoming situation(s). One question for anybody -with time being short, should I try to join a shelter group already set up and in place, get a group going or should I try it alone? I'm already somewhat prepared. E-mail me @ marcusa56@hotmail.com. Later. Marcus

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Fester Ingmar

Wednesday, April 11, 2001 - 02:58 am Click here to edit this post
Just a drop in note here. Some of the speculation is interesting but detracts somewhat from true information sharing. Yeah, yeah that's it.... that's the ticket... they shot our plane down. The commies are flying our own planes up the east coast out of Cuba... yeah yeah...thats it. Gimme a friggin break. What do you KNOW for sure? Anything?
Signed,
I can concoct a cooler scenerio than you can.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Fester Ingmar

Wednesday, April 11, 2001 - 03:32 am Click here to edit this post
Oh yeah. Hey Marcus, that Natural Disaster specialist title...does that mean you were the guy who tested the loud yellow horn for 11 years every stinking first tuesday of the month or did you work for FEMA? Let us know K? Info on FEMA would be gooood. (Rubs grimy little blistered fingers together) (From 2 weeks of digging shelter in hill behind house)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

shoots (Gedwards)

Thursday, April 12, 2001 - 10:00 am Click here to edit this post
You know, Zemin was on a 'trade' mission to Latin America when the EP-3 was grapped. This would make the Chicoms appear 'muy macho' in the eyes of the central Americans. Also the lose of their pilot would get additional sympathy. Meantime Putin de Russikieville was in Europe establishing deeper ties with the new Euro force. Keep in mind this force will be separate from NATO and might seriously undermine a US backed NATO. An interesting strategy seems to be unfolding. The Chicoms are setting up eco-ties with central America but the ultimate purpose might be for future military use in a Taiwanese confrontation. Also if the Russikies can destabilize NATO this might mean we could lose any Euro support if near term problems come up. Now the Russikies and Chicoms are setting up an axis to be signed on this summer. I don't know about you but this comes across as strategic thinking to me. Neutralize and isolate; if you know what I mean.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

shoots (Gedwards)

Friday, April 13, 2001 - 08:12 am Click here to edit this post
One more theory and that's it. Just maybe the Chicoms shot down their own plane by 'accident'. As Wong Way hot dogged buzzed the EP-3 the other guy might have nervously blasted away. Both of this Chicom pilots were inexperienced combat flyers plus they aren't trained as well as are people. If you've ever watched old dogfight films, pilots from the same side sometimes can get in each others way when fighting enemy planes. I know of one were an American pilot flies right into the tracers of the guy behind him who is firing at the enemy plane ahead of both of them. Also,from what I could see,the damage to the EP-3 doesn't seem to warrant the downing of a fighter. A fighter is a big heavy machine not a flimsy kite and it takes more than a nudge to bring them down. Oh well enough said, our people are back safe and we'll just have to see what happens next.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Alonzo W. Wight (Alonzow)

Friday, April 13, 2001 - 10:15 am Click here to edit this post
Someone who follows the controlled news outlets, please help me: is there no concern or anger about the loss of our hi-tech aircraft? Is no one talking about getting it back? In our joy at having the crew returned, have we completely forgotten about the loss of the plane and its contents? I heard a snip of news on the radio driving home and nowhere was the issue of our aircraft even mentioned - the impression was that now that our crew has returned safely, the story is over but for the post-game chat.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

shoots (Gedwards)

Sunday, April 15, 2001 - 04:44 pm Click here to edit this post
A thought to consider. You know one thing that's troubling is the Chicom timing on the EP-3 event. I say, well, it was almost brilliant; and that's surprising. Let's think, first of all Zemin got the bravado he needed to appear macho in the eyes of the Latinos. Second, the Chicoms are ransacking the EP-3 for all the Intel they can get(and that might be considerable). Third, they've managed to incite the left field bleacher Arabs who are clapping as hard as they can. Fourth, they've succeeded in angering their people at the US, an important factor in a future conflict. The Chicoms are getting better at international image building and the timing of events to build that image is very important. Now, I'm not apologizing for the Chicoms , believe me, but we've better get on the ball. If they learn how to start using this concept in military matters then they could become very effective. One thing though, tongue in cheek, they better start taking more flying lessons.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

shoots (Gedwards)

Wednesday, April 18, 2001 - 08:53 am Click here to edit this post
Those of you who want some interesting info just go to Rense.com and read the article about the Kitty Hawk and why it's not in the South China sea. The article was just recently posted. How true it is , well, I just don't know. My advice is though,'Go read!'.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of pageLink to this message  

Lester Leper (Theleper)

Thursday, January 26, 2006 - 05:39 am Click here to edit this post
21 000 Chemical Plants On China's Waterways Raises Alarm

China has 21,000 chemical plants located along its rivers and coastline, in many cases posing a ticking environmental time bomb with "unthinkable" consequences, the government said Tuesday [Jan. 24, 2006].

About 400 million people, or nearly one third of the nation's population, live along the banks of the Yangtze, while 100 million are settled in the Yellow River basin.

Previous government reports have said that more than 70 percent of China's rivers and lakes are polluted, while about 400 of China's 600 largest cities suffer from water shortages.

http://www.terradaily.com/reports/21_000_Chemical_Plants_On_Chinas_Waterways_Raises_Alarm.html


Add a Message


This is a private posting area. A valid username and password combination is required to post messages to this discussion.
Username:  
Password: